Three Shouts of "Huzzah!"

A stom­ach bug this week afforded me time to fin­ish Mayflower. The epi­logue, where Philbrick draws most of his con­clu­sions, is a fat ham­mer to the chest. And while there are many ideas worth dwelling on in there, one ques­tion has me absolutely enthralled:

How did Meta­com (aka Philip) go from the most hunted man in New Eng­land in the late 17th cen­tury to a mytho­log­i­cal proto-​​American freedom-​​fighter in the early-​​19th?

image of Metacom

Fron the get-​​go dude had plenty to be seri­ous about

Philbrick, under­stand­ably, rushes through the inter­ven­ing 150 years, and left me pon­der­ing. As I said to my mother on Wednes­day, it sounds like double-​​think; how else do you hold two entirely con­tra­dic­tory notions simul­ta­ne­ously? I’m so curi­ous about this trans­for­ma­tion, and scan­ning Philbrick’s notes in the back, I’ve already ordered a book on the Amer­i­can need for mytho­log­i­cal identity.

In part, it’s just intel­lec­tual pur­suit. A kind of trust that because my inter­est is piqued, some­thing juicy is wait­ing. But another, more enter­pris­ing part of me, thinks this could be the big con­nec­tion between the 17th & 19th cen­turies I’ve won­dered about. And when I get to think­ing about that, I real­ize there has been an identity-​​defining war in the 60s or 70s of every cen­tury of our coun­try. Also worth smok­ing on.

But as I get ramped for the gigan­tic pic­ture, smaller things are tug­ging at my heart. When Meta­com was – ahem, finally – killed, Ben­jamin Church, and his Eng­lish and Sakon­net sol­diers three times shouted “Huz­zah!” before dis­mem­ber­ing the Pokanoket sachem. Metacom’s head was, as was cus­tom, stuck on a pole out­side Ply­mouth. One of his hands went to Boston; the other Church gave as a prize to one of his Sakon­net warrior-​​soldiers. Who later put in a jar of rum and charged a pretty penny for view­ings. Dif­fer­ent world, dif­fer­ent world, dif­fer­ent world…

This was hardly the first time he was taken down a peg. As the Ply­mouth court record reads, Metacom’s brother, Wamsutta, came before the mag­is­trate ask­ing for a Chris­t­ian name. The court responded with Alexan­der (Wamsutta) and Philip (Meta­com). Richter claims those names referred to Alexan­der the Great, and his brother Philip, under whom the ancient world fell apart. Not long after his brother’s death (very likely by poi­son­ing at the hands of the Puri­tans), he stirred the pot again in the courts, and for his demands became known, mock­ingly, as King Philip.

Metacom’s death marked the end of arguably the most defin­ing war of our country’s his­tory. From this war we artic­u­lated Amer­i­can racism. And despite the deeply entan­gled eco­nomic cir­cum­stances that lead to bar­barism on both sides, we still call it Philip’s War. The Eng­lish were bystanders, the story goes, until they were com­pelled to react. Godly, you might say. Christian.

Comments
5 Responses to “Three Shouts of "Huzzah!"”
  1. Benjamin Bormann says:

    This might not deserve the label of “clever obser­va­tion,” but no wars through­out writ­ten his­tory been pred­i­cated on any­thing other than God. Yes, we fight for resources. But why do we think we deserve what our neigh­bors already have? Because God’s on our side. Hence the huzzahs.Also, I’d argue the Civil War was more defin­ing, but only because I know fuck­ing tons about it and know shit about Philip’s War. Preach it, brother — I’d like to know.

  2. Adam says:

    I’m real­iz­ing I don’t have a blow-​​by-​​blow of the War to demon­strate for you pre­cisely why I think this was the most defin­ing con­flict in our national his­tory. But if you’ll sat­isfy your­self with the impre­cise until I acquire or gen­er­ate that time­line, here’s the gist:The sale (and arguable theft) of land, mutu­ally dis­solv­ing trust of Indi­ans and Whites, Chris­t­ian con­ver­sion or purg­ing of Indi­ans, and birth of the Fron­tiers­man arche­type all had their pro­to­typ­i­cal begin­nings here. From this van­tage, now know­ing more about Metacom’s War than the Civil War (which I’ll be get­ting heav­ily into for Reser­voir Dredge), I think most of our most essen­tial Amer­i­can instincts (bad in the war, much good in the events pre­ced­ing it) had their ori­gins here. Thus my case for self-definition.But I’m will­ing to be schooled. In a while, I’ll be at your doorstep, bro. Believe.

  3. Biddy Tran says:

    Hey Adam,

    Awe­some research. I wanted to know where you got that image of Meta­com, or if you have any other info about that image, such as the date it was made, artist or the col­lec­tion it’s in, etc. I’m doing a series of large graphite on black paper draw­ings, and one of them is based on that image of Meta­com. I’d be grate­ful for any information.

    Thanks,
    Biddy

    • Adam says:

      Thanks! Hon­estly, your googling will be as effec­tive as mine. If I’m able to scan a ver­sion of it some day, I’ll let you know. :)

  4. Barefoot Ted says:

    Poignant post. A pow­er­ful moment in Amer­i­can history…and a style of inter­ac­tion and being that has pro­duced our civilization…and I wouldn’t say we built the best one pos­si­ble, not even close. Lots of room for improve­ment. Good to reex­am­ine the first roots of our engagement.

Leave A Comment

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

What's all this, then?

I’m writ­ing a book to under­stand my hometown’s dis­in­ter­est in its own his­tory, and my role in that. It’s sort of become a novel. This is the full story.

This is my play­ground. It reflects and pre­dicts what’s hap­pen­ing in the book.

Things I dis­cuss: East­ern Mass. his­tory, sto­ry­telling, book­mak­ing, time travel, poetry & nov­els, writ­ing craft, dreams, pub­lish­ing, indige­nous per­spec­tives, spir­i­tu­al­ity, sex, adop­tion and par­ent­ing, research, and what­ever I can’t get outta my head.